cryowizard (
cryowizard) wrote2007-02-07 05:22 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Entry tags:
Peace on Earth, or screw peaceniks
This guy refused to deploy to Iraq.
http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/46660B31-772A-45A1-A2B3-E176923F9B32.htm
I am not a military man, but even I know that a military man doesn't get to choose the deployments he goes on to. His ass belongs to Uncle Sam, pure and simple.
I can't say I support the war, especially how it was sold to us, but fuck this guy for downing the morale at the time of war, and fuck those "peacenik" idiots who undermine their own military by supporting what is basically a mutiny.
The fact that this article appears on al-Jazeera is not helping either. I bet they are happy to see our own fifth column cheer for this guy.
http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/46660B31-772A-45A1-A2B3-E176923F9B32.htm
I am not a military man, but even I know that a military man doesn't get to choose the deployments he goes on to. His ass belongs to Uncle Sam, pure and simple.
I can't say I support the war, especially how it was sold to us, but fuck this guy for downing the morale at the time of war, and fuck those "peacenik" idiots who undermine their own military by supporting what is basically a mutiny.
The fact that this article appears on al-Jazeera is not helping either. I bet they are happy to see our own fifth column cheer for this guy.
no subject
The fact that the President AND Congress OKed the war (and the order for him to be deployed) gives SOME weight to the legallity of the order, but does not conclusively prove it. To him, to me, and hopefully, to the Supreme Court. Again, your analysis of legality of the order stems from authority - President's authoirty and substance of his orders CAN and SHOULD BE questioned by Congress AND Courts. Congress CLEARLY failed to question and stop the President in his illegal conduct. That leaves Courts, and that's the authority that Wataba appealed to. And he WILL follow the procedure for the appeal, which may result in a finding that the order was legitimate and he will go to prison. Or, the courts will find that the order was illegal, as Wataba asserts, and the order to deploy Wataba (and many others) may be declared void. To me, Wataba is a hero because he took the risk of going to prison to argue that the order is illegal.
Your legality argument and conclusion are both based on accepting the authoirty of the President and Congress, which is EXACTLY what Wataba is challenging. i hope this explanation helps you come to a different conclusion with respect to the legality of the war and Wataba's case.
i have to say, your cause and effect statements are not very strong:
If that is allowed, the Military will disintegrate.
Soldiers are not supposed to pick and choose battles. But they should be allowed to use the country's mechanism to question and challenge the decisions of their superiors. We do not have a dictatorship and the "government" is not always right. And if i am allowed to challenge it, so should be every soldier who risks losing his life or limb to such decision. If the government said "shoot all jews", should the soldiers obey? Where do you put the safeguard between an illegal order and the guy with the gun? And what if the safeguards don't work?
Finally, the most important concept - if your "morale" is based on obedience, it's not morale. It's fear, subordination, whatever. TRUE morale stems from MORAL. When the army faces a MORAL war, you don't need morale, you don't need motivation, you don't need punishment. When the war is justified, soldiers WILL fight. So if a VOLUNTARY soldier doesn't want to fight, the problem is not with the soldier, the problem is in you, who gave the order to fight.
Your logical analysis is flawed. There have been unjust wars where soldiers walked out or refused to fight, and they all mobilized for JUST wars. This precedent is not for any war, it's for UNjust wars, and i would LOVE to set such a precedent.
P.S. Do you really think EVERY person who committed genocide in Rwanda was doing it out of desire and not blind passion? Granted, Rwanda is not as good of an example as Nazi Germany, but ANY time you have people blindly following you, you'd better be DAMN SURE you are right. Cause otherwise, you are doing some bad shit with their hands. And if somebody thinks you are being wrong, you'd better listen and double check. My 5 cents.